There has been some discussion on this group over the last few days
concerning the AOS project digitization of the Bulletins from 1932 to
present and offering them on a DVD.  The project has not been abandoned as
some have indicated.  The project is being done by me and Helga Gray.   It
is progressing although more slowly that we had hoped.  This is due to the
time it takes to work in an organization that meets one every six month, due
to schedule demands of my work, other projects that Helga is working on and
due to the fact that there is just a lot of work to do.  I want to emphasize
that the AOS is aware that there are products that they can produce which
are of great interest to the orchid community.  Indeed one of the reasons
that I was asked to join the AOS Information Committee was to bring the
expertise that Helga and I have in producing the Wildcatt database to other
projects that the AOS can offer to the orchid community.  The other reason
was that I was tired of complaining that the AOS never did anything - it was
time to do it.

   What has been done?  The Bulletins from 1970 through 1985 are scanned and
in electronic form.  We are in the process of scanning the Bulletins from
1955 through 1969.  The user interface that manipulates the index searches
and the display of the relevant pages from the Bulletin is complete.  The
reader program has gone though a beta review.  We received final approval to
complete the project based on the beta review.  It is now a matter of
scanning and integrating the images into the reader program.

   A comment was made about whipping this project off in a month or two, so
let me briefly say what has to be done.  First we are scanning each page at
300 dpi with resulting file sizes of 1.5 to 2.5 Meg per page.  There are
approximately 84,000 pages in the 70 + years of the publication.  Each page
is being compressed to 100-200kilobytes.  Doing the arithmetic shows that we
are now in the range of a few gigabytes for the entire set - a range
manageable on DVD's.   In this compression process, the yellow background is
removed while monitoring the clarity of the color and black and white
images.  Each page is reviewed, since in the printing process the ink can be
darker or lighter thus affecting the image quality for a given compression.
An electronic index of the subjects, authors and pictures is then generated.
This is a searchable index allowing a user to find topics and the articles.
We have written a graphical interface that integrates the search index with
the display of the image making up the article of interest.  

   When will it be done?  I'm very hesitant to predict when a software
project will be complete, especially when it is being done in available free
time.  This is the large part of the reason that we have not announced this
project earlier.  I hate hearing about promised software only to see the
vapors of the promise.  The plan is to complete the 1955 through 1969 issues
and then do the 1986-2000.  This way we can have an initial volume released
(late this year?), while we locate and scan the rarer 1932-1954 volumes.  

   I also want to make a financial point clear, the cost to the AOS is the
scanning of the 84,000 pages.  We are donating the license for the display
program, the electronic index of all of the Bulletins and the time to
prepare the images into a usable format.  We have contracted with a company
to do the scanning; a special reduced cost was arranged by allow the
scanning to be done in slower times.  I should point out that in no way has
the project been delayed by this scan rate.  The Trustees agreed to return a
part of the monies generated from offering this product to Information
Committee projects.  Harvey makes the AOS sound like it is making a profit
from this and that somehow that 'profit' is dirty.  I can assure everyone
that if we felt this way about the attitude of the AOS, we would not be
donating the effort put into this project.  I will remind everyone that
generating products such as a Bulletin on a CD and other offerings requires
resources.  If this 'profit' can bootstrap more projects, that's great.  

   I invite everyone on this list to find something that they can do to help
or to just do the thing that you always thought needed to be done by
someone.  Don't say that the AOS won't respond.  I have found that they will
if you make the effort.  To this point I can say that all those who have
complained that the AOS isn't interested in listening to and in inviting
comment, you have your opportunity.  Contact me, I am trustee; you know, one
of those who never listen.


Joe Gray
Wildcatt Database Co.


_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to