Part of this issue is how conventions and regulations are INTERPRETED and
APPLIED by the responsible organizations.  The USFWS seems to take its
charge of protecting endangered species far beyond the TRADE agreement that
is CITES.

The fact that signatory nations "agreed" that the in-vitro plants are not
under the auspices of CITES is unfortunately irrelevant to the subject of
getting them into the country.

As an analogy, here in the US, the FCC states that electromagnetic
radiation broadcast into the airwaves is freely receivable by anyone. 
However, Connecticut, Virginia and the District of Columbia have decided
that police radar detectors are illegal.  I suppose that one could spend a
lot of money in court battling the loss of one's radar detector and the
payment of the fine, but with the pockets of the powers-that-be being
deeper than most of us, it's basically a lost cause right from the start.

--  Ray

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Peter\(Can\) Croezen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 12:14:43 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [email protected]
Subject: [OGD] CITES does not apply to  App I flasks, according to CITES 


Steve who said:

>What Jerry has done is a valid action for sure.

Right, he had to follow that route; I never said Jerry did anything wrong.

>Peter, there is also another issue. If either of the parents are not
>legally owned/collected, or if the range country has never issued
>an export or reexport permit, the seedlings are not considered
>legal, and most certainly require CITES. 

I disagree, for if that were the case, the owner/collector would not get 
CITES for his flasks, but would be charged with illegal possession of 
App I plants; all would be confiscated.
This does not come into question at all Steve. 

The flasked seedlings Manola Arias sells for his father, Manuel Arias
Silva, 
are  supposedly propagated from crosses between the five legal parent
plants, 
which Manola names in pairs as the parents of his flasked seedlings offered
for sale.
(see his Peru-Flora brochure)
If INRENA believes the Pk flasks are what Manola says they are, they can
allow the
export of them  without a CITES permit.

The accepted  rule by member CITES countries,  is clear.........no CITES
permits are 
required for App I flasks propagated from legal AP I plants.







--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .



_______________________________________________
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
[email protected]
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com

Reply via email to