Hi, Sorry but I am replying to my own post. I just discover that Kew & IPNI has both names in their monocot checklist at per http://www.kew.org/searchepic/searchpage.do
I found that Den trantuanii description : Perner & X.N.Dang, Orchidee (Hamburg) 54: 220 (2003) so apparently it's an earlier publication (I still appreciate a scan copy if possible). But another question came to my mind... are these 2 names referring to the same species? Thanks again. Nik On 13 Jul 2005 at 9:45, Nik Fahmi wrote: > Hi all, > > Does anybody know which is the valid name of this newly > discovered Vietnamese species. I have Orchids (Feb. 2004) > magazine which published the description of this species as > Den. tuananhiii Averyanov but I were told it was also published > in Orchidee as Den trantuanii. I do not have Orchidee's > publication to refer to and I would be very grateful if somebody would > be kind enough to e-mail me a scan. > > RHS apparently accepted Den trantuanii as the valid name in > their International Orchid Register so is it because Orchidee > publication was made at an earlier date? > > Thanks for any insight. > > Nik > --- > Homepage : http://zanaf.dyndns.biz > > > > _______________________________________________ > the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) > [email protected] > http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com --- Homepage : http://zanaf.dyndns.biz _______________________________________________ the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD) [email protected] http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com
