On 08/01/14 12:14, David Gerard wrote: > No, they're arguing that this solves a problem we don't have, and > causes a problem we don't yet have. You're reframing it as a stronger > claim, that is not actually being made.
So, to be clear: the article's (and your?) position is that we should wait until we can prove that voter fraud is happening via impersonation before we address it? How might such evidence come to light? Gerv -- Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [email protected] or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
