On 8 January 2014 13:54, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote: > My point: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
In this case, actually it is: it's an absence of evidence *precisely where one would expect evidence* were it the case. - d. -- Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [email protected] or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
