As I understand it (from
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2014/complain-about-mobile-overblocking)
BBFC don't actually do classification of all websites. They just wrote a
framework document and do a second stage of appeals. So such a document won't
exist in the BBFC.
Alex
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 6:12 PM, Neil Dunbar <[email protected]> wrote:
On 11 Mar 2014, at 17:46, Alex Burr <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>Maybe this has been mentioned before, if so, I apologise.
>>The BBFC (who apparently now do classification for the mobile operators) seem
>>to have recently issued a report on appeals:
>>http://www.bbfc.co.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/Quarterly%20Report%20March%202014.pdf
>>
>>
>>They appear to have had to unblock, among others, girlguiding.org.uk,
>>dignityindying.org.uk, mariestopes.org.uk, and plannedparenthood.org
>
>Since it’s the BBFC, which publishes the data on what films have been
>classified 18 or R18, there should be no objection in its publishing the sites
>which it classifies similarly, one would think. (For instance, latest BBFC
>decisions: http://www.bbfc.co.uk/releases/latest-decisions). Yet I cannot find
>the link on its site to its website classification.
>
>
>I can understand the logic in not wishing the IWF to publish the sites which
>are found to violate British law, but this is _legal_ content, but which is
>deemed suitable for adults only, no?
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>
>Neil
>
>--
>Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future:
>https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join
>
>To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
>[email protected]
>or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
>
>
--
Please support ORG's work - join and help fund our future:
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/join
To unsubscribe, send a blank email to
[email protected]
or use https://lists.openrightsgroup.org/listinfo/org-discuss
