Ha. "Queer" not "queen", but, for some folks, may be same diff. :)

J

On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 7:31 PM Julian Blechner <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Didn't we just have an email thread that listed out literally dozens of
> dances with n95 mask policies and zero outbreaks, while we see spread of
> covid at other dances?
>
> As Mac wrote, numbers are going up. They haven't actually gone down since
> April.
>
> It's working, and, in New England, we're seeing _more_ younger dancers.
> (That is more likely due to gender free calling and outward acceptance of
> queen dancers, which seems like another topic.)
>
> But tossing that all aside, there's one big reason to keep masking:
> Contra with n95 masks is one of the only reasonably safe social outlet in
> this "new normal". Contra dancers with medical conditions - or have
> immediate family - is about 1 in 6 according to polling. Take away masked
> contra, and we are relegated back to second-class citizen status.
>
> Instead, I suggest that there's _plenty_ of mask-optional dances out
> there. Choice is available. There's no need to take away dancing for 1 in 6
> of us.
>
> Julian
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 7:02 PM Don Veino via Organizers <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm going to avoid the public health data, etc. aspect and approach this
>> in a more practical way...
>>
>> Under the business maxim that it's far cheaper/ easier to keep an
>> existing customer than obtain a new one, my simplified perspective is: what
>> does your community want?
>>
>> I asked mine back around April. The local BIDA group did so in a wider
>> way more recently. In both cases the answer was effectively "not yet".
>> Sure, some were ready to remove all measures. Others, parts. But the
>> significant majority wanted the existing measures to continue.
>>
>> One might argue that's not surprising given the folks most likely to
>> reply were those willing to attend under the existing circumstances. But
>> those are the folks we *have* and there's great difficulty accurately
>> determining what would happen under a different scheme (provided one was
>> inclined to try it) - will sufficient of those that haven't been attending
>> be willing to swerve sharply away from their substitute activities to make
>> up for the known entities that will shy away due to the change?
>>
>> I'm not ready to take that leap with the expenses of my dance yet.
>>
>> -Don
>>
>> P.S.: this applies to both performers and dancers - when I asked, the
>> callers were particularly concerned about retaining the existing measures
>> and the musicians slightly less so.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 6:20 PM Joe Harrington via Organizers <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> While I'm happy to comply with any COVID policy in order to dance, and I
>>> choose to wear a mask at bigger events, I question whether the contra
>>> communities' strict policies are doing us much good, either in protecting
>>> us medically or in getting dances going again. Consider:
>>>
>>> 1. Even in the most restricted states (New England, etc.), nearly
>>> everyone is maskless nearly all the time in normal life, including most
>>> dancers. People eat in very crowded restaurants, ride public
>>> transportation, fly on airplanes, sit in airports, go shopping, work,
>>> attend school, do sports, go to the gym, sing, interact with friends and
>>> family members who have been out in the community maskless, etc., mostly
>>> without masks.
>>>
>>> 2. As a result of #1, covid is spreading quite effectively in our
>>> communities, even if a few groups are still masking.
>>>
>>> 3. As a result of #2, protocols at a dance cannot much alter community
>>> spread rates, even if the dance spread rate were zero.
>>>
>>> But, this isn't concerning most people because:
>>>
>>> 4. Vaccines do keep nearly every infected person out of the hospital and
>>> reduce long covid.
>>>
>>> 5. For those going to the hospital or suspected to be at risk,
>>> monoclonal and other treatments are quite effective.
>>>
>>> 6. As a result, the mortality of covid-19 is now down to three times
>>> that of a bad flu season, which is way down from the mass carnage of 2020.
>>>
>>> It is questionable what anything but masking is doing for us:
>>>
>>> 7. Unmasked contra dancing, even with a vaccine and negative test, does
>>> lead to rapid covid spread. Several camps in summer 2022 had 50+ infected
>>> dancers, even though they were all vaccinated and all had tested negative
>>> on arrival. The incubation period and false-negative rate are enough to
>>> allow one or two cases through, and the vaccine no longer keeps you from
>>> getting it, it just dramatically reduces severity.
>>>
>>> Since:
>>>
>>> 8. Even in the most conservative, vaccine-averse Southern communities,
>>> 90+% of contra dancers at big events say they are vaccinated (per survey at
>>> Summer Contradancers Delight Holiday in Tennessee).
>>>
>>> 9. Choosing to wear a mask remains an option for everyone, and is quite
>>> effective at keeping the wearer healthy, though it is not foolproof (but
>>> neither is life).
>>>
>>> And:
>>>
>>> 10. People have options for recreational and social activities, and many
>>> are choosing those with fewer or no restrictions, especially young people
>>> who don't have much personal risk from covid.
>>>
>>> 11. Essentially all other organized dance communities besides
>>> contra/English/etc. are dancing without restrictions on a national
>>> level, and have been since early 2022: Square, swing, blues, ballroom,
>>> salsa, tango, etc.
>>>
>>> It may therefore be time for communities to reconsider absolute
>>> restrictions, and instead encourage vaccination and mask-wearing as
>>> effective ways to stop the spread of diseases like covid, but also the flu,
>>> RSV, and other pathogens.
>>>
>>> People can still (and I do) choose to wear masks if they are concerned
>>> about getting covid. The idea of reducing spread at dances would be a good
>>> one if the rest of society were playing along. But, it isn't.  When I was a
>>> teen, I boycotted China. China didn't change.
>>>
>>> Communities with a large component of at-risk dancers who mask in
>>> general life and who are vaccinated may wish to continue requiring
>>> vax+mask.  In areas with many dancers, two dances, one requiring masks and
>>> one mask-optional, may make the most sense.
>>>
>>> I am especially concerned at the reduced percentage of younger dancers I
>>> have seen at recent events. While it seemed, prepandemic, that there was a
>>> nascent resurgence in the popularity of contra among the current
>>> twentysomethings, few of the young dancers I used to see are showing up to
>>> dances post-covid. When I go to swing and blues, there are lots of younger
>>> dancers.  I am certain that if we required masks at my college contra
>>> dance, students would just go to ballroom, salsa, or swing.
>>>
>>> If we want to get contra going again, and especially if we want to
>>> attract many new younger dancers, who are not worried that getting covid
>>> represents a big risk to them and who have plenty of unrestricted options
>>> in recreational activities, perhaps it's time not to ask, "does this policy
>>> stop covid from transmitting at our dance," but rather, "does this policy
>>> significantly lower the total covid risk our dancers face?"
>>>
>>> I argue that strict policies no longer do that, given our behavior in
>>> society.  Nonetheless, those of us who are concerned can still choose to
>>> reduce our own risk substantially by being vaccinated and wearing a
>>> well-fitting KN95 or better mask whenever we are in a crowd, including at
>>> dances, without requiring it of others.  I do.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --jh--
>>> Joe Harrington
>>> Organizer, Greater Orlando Contra Dance
>>> Faculty Advisor, Contra Knights, the UCF contra dancing club
>>> contraknights.org
>>> FB, Ig: Contra Knights
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Organizers mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Organizers mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Organizers mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to