Thank you Luigi. That is what my research suggested, I just wanted to make sure I was on the right track before digging into code and design testing.
It is then possible to scale the embedded database across multiple servers, yes? On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 9:11:20 AM UTC-5, Luigi Dell'Aquila wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > I do not have detailed data about differences in performance between > Python and Java interfaces, anyway Java API in embedded server is the most > performing in absolute, you can expect more than twice as the performance > IMHO. > > Embedding OrientDB in Java applications is a very common practice, your > application will be able to expose REST services on its own port, then you > can decide to just use OrientDB as a plocal db (without binary/REST > interfaces enabled) or to start it as a full featured embedded server (with > plugins, binary and rest interfaces). There is no need to touch the source > code, basically what you need to do is just open a db connection with > "plocal:" path. > > Luigi > > > 2015-04-21 15:46 GMT+02:00 <[email protected] <javascript:>>: > >> I am creating a restful server that will more-less expose premade types >> of queries. For instance: GET /relationships/mutual-friends?a=11&b=14. That >> is an incredibly simple example. The end server is providing relational >> data for deep learning models. The server itself needs to be able to handle >> oAuth, user access lists, and these premade queries. That's all. >> >> Performance is absolutely crucial as is the future ability to replicate >> and scale the database. Most of the rest of the stack is written in python >> with client-side interfaces in HTML5/CSS/JS so my first reaction is to use >> a python microframework for the rest server and communicate through binary >> connections. But,* is there a significant performance gain between this >> an using a native Java Api on an embedded server?* Has anyone done >> benchmarks? >> >> Assuming that it is close to twice as performant to use the native api on >> an embedded database, my first thought would be to embed an orientdb into >> something like the SpringFramework. However, orientdb obviously has a >> restful architecture.* Is it possible/safe to extend this server >> architecture* to add new routes while keeping administrative functions >> locked away from the end-user? I do not want to modify the source, but wrap >> or extend it. >> >> Has anyone face a similar situation and has some feedback. It would be >> greatly appreciated. >> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "OrientDB" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
