Thank you both. You have confirmed what I needed to dig in. I'm excited to 
be working with orientdb.

On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:54:37 PM UTC-5, Colin wrote:
>
> The embedded OrientDB server may be used in distributed mode just fine, 
> even with other non-embedded instances.
>
> -Colin
>
> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:31:02 PM UTC-5, [email protected] 
> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you Luigi. That is what my research suggested, I just wanted to 
>> make sure I was on the right track before digging into code and design 
>> testing.
>>
>> It is then possible to scale the embedded database across multiple 
>> servers, yes?
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 9:11:20 AM UTC-5, Luigi Dell'Aquila wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> I do not have detailed data about differences in performance between 
>>> Python and Java interfaces, anyway Java API in embedded server is the most 
>>> performing in absolute, you can expect more than twice as the performance 
>>> IMHO.
>>>  
>>> Embedding OrientDB in Java applications is a very common practice, your 
>>> application will be able to expose REST services on its own port, then you 
>>> can decide to just use OrientDB as a plocal db (without binary/REST 
>>> interfaces enabled) or to start it as a full featured embedded server (with 
>>> plugins, binary and rest interfaces). There is no need to touch the source 
>>> code, basically what you need to do is just open a db connection with 
>>> "plocal:" path.
>>>
>>> Luigi
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-04-21 15:46 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>> I am creating a restful server that will more-less expose premade types 
>>>> of queries. For instance: GET /relationships/mutual-friends?a=11&b=14. 
>>>> That 
>>>> is an incredibly simple example. The end server is providing relational 
>>>> data for deep learning models. The server itself needs to be able to 
>>>> handle 
>>>> oAuth, user access lists, and these premade queries. That's all.
>>>>
>>>> Performance is absolutely crucial as is the future ability to replicate 
>>>> and scale the database. Most of the rest of the stack is written in python 
>>>> with client-side interfaces in HTML5/CSS/JS so my first reaction is to use 
>>>> a python microframework for the rest server and communicate through binary 
>>>> connections. But,* is there a significant performance gain between 
>>>> this an using a native Java Api on an embedded server?* Has anyone 
>>>> done benchmarks?
>>>>
>>>> Assuming that it is close to twice as performant to use the native api 
>>>> on an embedded database, my first thought would be to embed an orientdb 
>>>> into something like the SpringFramework. However, orientdb obviously has a 
>>>> restful architecture.* Is it possible/safe to extend this server 
>>>> architecture* to add new routes while keeping administrative functions 
>>>> locked away from the end-user? I do not want to modify the source, but 
>>>> wrap 
>>>> or extend it.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone face a similar situation and has some feedback. It would be 
>>>> greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>>
>>>> --- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "OrientDB" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OrientDB" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to