vineri, 24 aprilie 2015, 19:11:18 UTC+2, retrography a scris: > > What about Neo4j 2.2.0? >
Well the scope of this exercise was to figure out if graphdb-benchmarks project is the right tool for comparing them, additional effort is required for upgrading Neo4j library as there were changes in API. If it proves it can be used then I'll update Neo4j library and contribute changes upstream. Unfortunately seems like there are not too many people (actually no one considering feedback I got so far) on this mailing list using it, so probably I have to look for something else > > Buy the way, the scores you are citing for Neo4j seem to be way above what > is reported on the project's website: > Right, but pretty sure they depend on system used for testing - mind that also OrientDB scores are higher than what is reported there. George > > ENQW-FN1.87*0.56*0.95AMQW-FN6.473.50*1.85*YTQW-FN20.719.34*4.51*LJQW-FN > 213.41303.09*47.07*ENQW-FA3.780.71*0.16*AMQW-FA13.772.30*0.36*YTQW-FA42.82 > 6.15*1.46*LJQW-FA460.25518.12*16.53* > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
