Neo4j 2.2.0 seems to have significant improvements in certain areas (specially in execution plans -- as well as memory management).
I don't know what is happening in this group, but I definitely have a hard time finding resources on OrientDB. The engine is much more flexible for my use cases, but the query interface does not behave, and I have difficult finding basic help. On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 6:07:42 PM UTC-4, George Niculae wrote: > > > > vineri, 24 aprilie 2015, 19:11:18 UTC+2, retrography a scris: >> >> What about Neo4j 2.2.0? >> > > Well the scope of this exercise was to figure out if graphdb-benchmarks > project is the right tool for comparing them, additional effort is required > for upgrading Neo4j library as there were changes in API. If it proves it > can be used then I'll update Neo4j library and contribute changes upstream. > Unfortunately seems like there are not too many people (actually no one > considering feedback I got so far) on this mailing list using it, so > probably I have to look for something else > > >> >> Buy the way, the scores you are citing for Neo4j seem to be way above >> what is reported on the project's website: >> > > Right, but pretty sure they depend on system used for testing - mind that > also OrientDB scores are higher than what is reported there. > > George > > >> >> ENQW-FN1.87*0.56*0.95AMQW-FN6.473.50*1.85*YTQW-FN20.719.34*4.51*LJQW-FN >> 213.41303.09*47.07*ENQW-FA3.780.71*0.16*AMQW-FA13.772.30*0.36*YTQW-FA >> 42.826.15*1.46*LJQW-FA460.25518.12*16.53* >> > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
