OK, it exists in 2.1.0 GA. I posted simple code to reproduce, have you just fast-checked it?
I tried to evaluate OrientDB (2.0 & 2.1) several times, and always was stopped by blockers. It is claimed to be rock-solid, may be I do something wrong? On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 10:24:06 AM UTC+3, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi! > > This was found 2 months ago in 2.0.10 , I can reproduce it in 2.1-rc6 > https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/4257 > > > IMHO it is blocker, at least I cant use lucene indexes (yes, we need mixed > transactions with searches and updates in one transaction). Is this issue > planned to be fixed in 2.1 GA? > > Thanks > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
