Hi i've checked it see here
https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/4257 2015-08-10 11:26 GMT+02:00 <[email protected]>: > OK, it exists in 2.1.0 GA. I posted simple code to reproduce, have you > just fast-checked it? > > I tried to evaluate OrientDB (2.0 & 2.1) several times, and always was > stopped by blockers. It is claimed to be rock-solid, may be I do something > wrong? > > > > > > > On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 10:24:06 AM UTC+3, [email protected] > wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> This was found 2 months ago in 2.0.10 , I can reproduce it in 2.1-rc6 >> https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb/issues/4257 >> >> >> IMHO it is blocker, at least I cant use lucene indexes (yes, we need >> mixed transactions with searches and updates in one transaction). Is this >> issue planned to be fixed in 2.1 GA? >> >> Thanks >> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "OrientDB" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OrientDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
