----- Original Message ----- Chris Lotte wrote:
I'm guessing this is probably not a good forum for this to turn into a debate, so I'll just note without detail that I don't think Morris was confused at all... and I don't think the intentionality of the pattern or its essential-ness to the model from which it is derived is relevant. I can understand how you see things differently, though! You are correct. "Confusion" was not the right word. I should have said "her opinion". Also I forgot to mention that I consider her work creative and fascinating. If I had crease patterns and she had asked to use them I would have said yes and probably asked for no more compensation then being listed as the source of the original pattern. Tom
