> > This might be of some historical interest for origami and mathematics.
I’d say it most definitely is! Very interesting find. > The usual set of origami axioms are acknowledged to be formed by > Huzita-Justin-Hatori (https://langorigami.com/article/huzita-justin-axioms/). Aha! So is it now Johnson-Hujita-Justin-Hatori axioms? JHJH is kind of symmetrical. > I've looked in Donovan A. Johnson: Paper folding for the mathematics class, > National council of teachers of mathematics, USA, 1957. Photographic reprint > 2019. I’d generally agree with your summation of the points, however, there’s others on the list with more authority and knowledge that can offer more substantial input. Do you happen to have a link to the publication? Thanks, Matthew Ps. Minor toot: I’m about to release a run of my new robotic origami kits: called oribokit :) There will be some available for postage internationally. More info soon.
