> Isn't container-managed transactions the point of > EJBs anyway? So database > transaction > facilities are no longer mission critical? Or am I > missing something... I believe that the EJB container always relies on the database to supply the transactional capability. If you use MySQL with EJB in a transactional context, that would be equivalent to turning auto-commit off -- it won't work. Consider what the alternative to this would be -- the container would have to interpose itself as a transitional transactional database between itself and arbitrary data stores. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com
- EJB w/ different DB's Frank Apap
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Brien Voorhees
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Jacob Smullyan
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Neville Burnell
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Kucera, Rich
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Robert Kr�ger
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Jacob Smullyan
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Kucera, Rich
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Robert Kr�ger
