On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Magnus Rydin wrote: > > > But if your system does not need this (now or in the future), Databasesystems > > > like MySQL is excellent. > > > > Under what cicumstances is mysql better than one of the four? Or even > > PostgreSQL? > > _like_ MySQL :) > That is small, cheap, and fast on fairly simple types of DBs. I assume you didn't read my earlier discussion as to why MySQL is more or less always a bad idea?
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Neville Burnell
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Kucera, Rich
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Robert Kr�ger
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Jacob Smullyan
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Kucera, Rich
- RE: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Elias Martensson
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Magnus Rydin
- Re: EJB w/ different DB's Robert Kr�ger
