> We don't need to waste time asking for non-j2ee functionality (like > "simple basic auth" sounds, to me, considering that the list has had > working directions for "simple basic auth" a day or two ago that work) or > capabilities it already has (like PHP and CGI support). Sure, but setting up "basic auth" is a) Not documented well. b) Certainly not as easy as it should be. This creates a barrier to entry. Over all, I very much like Orion, but attention to detail like this separates a good product from a great one.
- Re: what are you missing in apache-like functionality? Andrew Panagos
- Re: what are you missing in apache-like functiona... Jason von Nieda
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like function... Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like fun... Mike Cannon-Brookes
- OPTIONS Gavin Thomas Nicol
- orion CGI/Perl examples? Gary Shea
- Re: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like function... Cory Adams
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like fun... Mike Cannon-Brookes
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like... Joseph B. Ottinger
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-... J.T. Wenting
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-... Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apa... Joseph B. Ottinger
- RE: POLL: what are you missing i... Robert Krueger
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like function... Gavin Thomas Nicol
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like function... Cory Adams
- Re: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like function... Karl Avedal
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like fun... J.T. Wenting
- RE: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like... Robert Krueger
- Re: POLL: what are you missing in apache-like function... Christian Sell
