I just don't like it. I've used it for several months, and the C++ version
for a year and could not get the hang of it. The logic IBM uses is beyond
me, maybe. Also, the frequeny crashes and appalling performance didn't do
any good.
Jeroen T Wenting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ UIN #9191966
It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine (Michael Stipe)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 11 December 2000 15:15
> To: Orion-Interest
> Subject: AW: Off topic: development tools
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using VisualAge for Java. It has a nice integration of
> external APIs and Applicationservers. Visual Debuging and an
> integrated VCS are supported. You have access to every
> project without loading it manually...
>
> Mario
>
> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Dezember 2000 12:03
> An: Orion-Interest
> Betreff: Off topic: development tools
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am in the process of selecting an IDE for developing J2EE
> applications on Orion. I would appreciate any advice on the
> subject. I've noticed from emails that JBuilder is quite
> popular. Other contenders that I know off are: Visual Caf�,
> JDeveloper (Oracle flavour of JBuilder), public domain tools
> like Ant, etc.
>
> The features I am mainly interested in are: ability to
> develop for different Apps Servers, visual debugging,
> validation of conformance with specifications (e.g. for EJBs).
>
> I will be grateful for your comments and recommendations.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek Skreta
>
>
winmail.dat
