On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:11 +0100, Chen, Congwu wrote: > Per the discussion, I implemented a correct change log detection based on > multi-profile and Lukas will work further: > "make the decision if sop_add is sent as a <Replace> or a <Add> depending on > a config option, so we can use both variants (of course, only for clients). > only in case we disguise sop_add as <Replace>, apply the statistics > workaround when checking for status." > > We don't have bug entries for this, do we need one?
If we were expected to do something about it, then it would have been useful in bugzilla.moblin.org. Whether Lukas wants to track this in the Synthesis tracker is a different question. It would be useful because then I could add a link to it into the patch that we carry in our "master" branch, saying something like "needed while this upstream feature request is open". -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
