Hi Patrick,
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:36 , Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 08:48 +0100, Lukas Zeller wrote:
Hi Patrick,
It looks to me this is the same situation that Congwu has already
solved (see thread "Discussion: Client+Resend data: bug#3427, add
sysync::STEP_RESENDDATA").
Just issue a STEP_RESENDDATA instead of repeating STEPCMD_SENTDATA.
No, that's not quite it. What I am trying to tell the engine is "I'm
still sending your data, tell me whether I should continue".
I see. But I see no way how the engine could possibly take that
decision from you.
It has requested from you that you send out the message and receive
the answer, and is only interested in either success or failure of
that. It is entirely the apps/the transport's decision how to
accomplish the task including retries and other failure recoveries,
and giving up when the task cannot be accomplished.
So my bottom line is - ne need to call the engine in between.
Best Regards,
Lukas Zeller ([email protected])
-
Synthesis AG, SyncML Solutions & Sustainable Software Concepts
[email protected], http://www.synthesis.ch
_______________________________________________
os-libsynthesis mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
