Hello Lukas! Thanks a million for working on this over the weekend.
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 02:50 -0700, Lukas Zeller wrote: > Patrick, can you verify the patch solves the delete case you ran into? Yes, but I myself won't have time before tomorrow. Congwu, what is the right invocation of client-test to trigger the endless 222 loop with Funambol, assuming that the loop detection is removed? I want to double-check that the real loop is still detected. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list os-libsynthesis@synthesis.ch http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
