On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 02:50 -0700, Lukas Zeller wrote: > Patrick, can you verify the patch solves the delete case you ran into?
It does, and as Congu already said, the loop detection still works in the case where it really matters. I've ported the code back to the old "master" and used it in SyncEvolution 0.9.1 beta 2. > PS: As we have switched internally to using unilib and found no > regressions, I merged unilib into master (and luz) in the synthesis > indefero repository. As a point of reference: before that merge, the > master was at tag "libsynthesis_3.2.0.35". I'll make the same change on moblin.org shortly and create a "syncevolution-0.9.x" branch for maintenance of SyncEvolution 0.9.1. Perhaps it'll make more sense to switch to the latest Synthesis code even for that, but right now I'm conservative. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ os-libsynthesis mailing list [email protected] http://lists.synthesis.ch/mailman/listinfo/os-libsynthesis
