Richard S. Hall wrote:
Bennett, Timothy (JIS - Applications) wrote:
Terrific. I'll work on getting my code committed sometime today. I may
have some questions about package names the project has decided to use
and other housekeeping stuff like that.
I'm excited and honored to be part of this team. Thanks for vote of
confidence. The work that Richard and his team have done so far on the
OSGi spec and the Oscar implementation is really impressive.
"My team" says, "Thanks." :-)
Speaking of package names, I have started to go through and rename some
packages in the Oscar source code. For example:
org.ungoverned ==> org.apache.osgi
org.ungoverned.oscar ==> org.apache.osgi.framework
The two above substitutions will pretty much tell you how every package
is renamed in the current Oscar 2.0 code.
I expect at some time we will also have:
org.apache.osgi.service
org.apache.osgi.bundle
Which will contain service definitions and bundle implementations,
respectively.
Just to be clear, you want to use the org.apache.osgi package, rather
than org.apache.oscar? IMO that would fit a bit better into Apache
package naming conventions, to the extent they exist.
Thoughts?
Regards, Upayavira (a Cocoon person who wants to find the time to work
on Oscar)
