Richard S. Hall wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Just to be clear, you want to use the org.apache.osgi package, rather
than org.apache.oscar? IMO that would fit a bit better into Apache
package naming conventions, to the extent they exist.
Thoughts?
Which one fits better?
Initially I figured org.apache.oscar for historical purposes, but it was
suggested to be more generic, so I don't have a problem with that.
My preference is the generic approach since you avoid possible trademark
issues further down the road, in particular when it comes to graduating
from the incubator.
Enrique
