jar naming convention

[Enrique Rodriguez]

Hi, Felix list,

I'd like to expand our naming convention discussion to the "next level 
down," namely to bundle jars and so I was wondering about a naming 
convention for bundles at Apache.  Apache jars have typically had a name 
like lucene-1.4.3.jar or commons-logging-1.0.4.jar.  And Eclipse names 
stuff in reverse FQCN, such as org.eclipse.core.runtime_3.1.0.jar, which 
I have personally gotten used to since it maps well to my projects and 
lines up nicely in folder listings.  I was wondering what pros and cons 
people had for the various conventions and if it was worth trying to 
figure something out here.  Just wanted to start a dialog.

Enrique