Well, for the framework, I would prefer felix.jar for simplicity. I can
understand the desire to have the version in there and felix-1.0.0.jar
isn't so bad. I am not convinced that
org.apache.felix.framework-1.0.0.jar is so great. :-)
I guess I personify things too much...to me, felix.jar seems much more
personable.
-> richard
Enrique Rodriguez wrote:
Hi, Felix list,
I'd like to expand our naming convention discussion to the "next level
down," namely to bundle jars and so I was wondering about a naming
convention for bundles at Apache. Apache jars have typically had a
name like lucene-1.4.3.jar or commons-logging-1.0.4.jar. And Eclipse
names stuff in reverse FQCN, such as
org.eclipse.core.runtime_3.1.0.jar, which I have personally gotten
used to since it maps well to my projects and lines up nicely in
folder listings. I was wondering what pros and cons people had for
the various conventions and if it was worth trying to figure something
out here. Just wanted to start a dialog.
Enrique
