For the Framework, the following is optional

    Security
    Require-Bundle
    Fragments

The question is how important it is for Felix to be compliant. As an
OSGi official I would say: Paramount! However, from I guess that looks
slightly more subtle from Richard's perspective. :-)

Kind regards,

     Peter Kriens
     



DD> What is exactly mandatory in R4 ? the Core ?
DD> So "ConditionalPermissionAdmin" chapter is required ?

DD> Didier


DD> Richard S. Hall a écrit :

>> Well, yes, if we want to claim to be 100% spec compliant...
>>
>> -> richard
>>
>> BJ Hargrave wrote:
>>
>>> But you do have the responsibility of specification compliance. If
>>> Felix wants to hold itself out to the public as an OSGi 
>>> implementation, then it must implement all mandatory parts of the 
>>> specification. You do not know who will be using Felix and, 
>>> collectively, they will expect all mandatory parts of the spec to be
>>> implemented.
>>>
>>> BJ Hargrave
>>> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
>>> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>>>
>>> "Richard S. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005-09-30 10:59:29
>>> AM:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> I think marking them somehow would be worthwhile, but I am not 
>>>> necessarily saying they are more important than other tasks. If no
>>>> one wanted a particular feature, it could be a waste of time to 
>>>> implement it   
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> if there are other tasks that people do want.
>>>>
>>>> -> richard
>>>>
>>>> BJ Hargrave wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>> The should be clearly marked since spec compliance items must be
>>>>> done, while the others are optional.
>>>>>
>>>>> BJ Hargrave
>>>>> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
>>>>> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>>>>>
>>>>> "Richard S. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005-09-30 
>>>>> 10:41:18     
>>>>
>>> AM:
>>>  
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>> Upayavira wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually, it is probably easier than that. Just write a list of
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>
>>> things  
>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>>> you'd like to do if you had an infinite amount of time, and add a
>>>>>>> few         
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>>>> things you think you really _should_ do, if you could only feel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>
>>>>> bothered.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds reasonable. I had already put a few things in JIRA previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, this list could get pretty long if I list everything in
>>>>>> R4       
>>>>>
>>> that  
>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>>
>>>>>> needs to be done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are basically two levels of tasks, spec compliance ones and
>>>>>> ones       
>>>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>>> that I would like to do to improve the design. I am not sure if
>>>>>> these two should be differentiated in any way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -> richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>




-- 
Peter Kriens                              Mob +33633746480
9C, Avenue St. Drézéry                    Tel +33467542167
34160 Beaulieu, France                    Tel +15123514821
                                          Tel +33870447986
AOL,Yahoo, Skype pkriens                  ICQ 255570717

Reply via email to