Just out of curiousity: are any of the current comitters paid for working on oscar, or is this fully voluntary?
Eelco On 9/30/05, BJ Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well the question is: do you describe Felix as an OSGi framework > implementation or a framework which implement portions of the OSGi > framework specification? > > I desperately hope it is the former. Otherwise it is like Tomcat picking > and chosing what parts of servlet or JSP it implements. > > BJ Hargrave > Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM > OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Office: +1 407 849 9117 Mobile: +1 386 848 3788 > > Peter Kriens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 2005-09-30 04:18:02 PM: > > > For the Framework, the following is optional > > > > Security > > Require-Bundle > > Fragments > > > > The question is how important it is for Felix to be compliant. As an > > OSGi official I would say: Paramount! However, from I guess that looks > > slightly more subtle from Richard's perspective. :-) > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Peter Kriens > > > > > > > > > > DD> What is exactly mandatory in R4 ? the Core ? > > DD> So "ConditionalPermissionAdmin" chapter is required ? > > > > DD> Didier > > > > > >
