Also, I should have updates status on the IA64 support in a couple of
hours.
-Brian
Thus spake Jeff Squyres ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I would like to propose the following:
>
> - since IA64 support is currently broken
> - since CVS is frozen
> - since there's at least some pending work that has been waiting for about
> a month (i.e., can't be committed)
> - since this means that other OSCAR work has come to a standstill
>
> We should do one of the following:
>
> 1. release what we have now as 2.1.1 without support for IA64; the big
> selling point is more network drivers, etc. This is with intent to
> someday do 2.2 with IA64 support restored (i.e., when SI -- or
> whatever the problem is -- gets fixed). IA64 people would still use
> 2.1.
>
> 2. forget the idea of releasing now, and unfreeze CVS so that IA64
> support can be fixed and other OSCAR development can progress.
>
> 3. branch CVS so that 2.2 is on its own branch and development work can
> progress at the head.
>
> I'm actually pretty opposed to #3, but it is a legitimate option, so it's
> only fair that it should be listed.
>
> Comments? Suggestions?
>
> --
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
--
----------------------------------------------
Brian Elliott Finley Argonne, MCS Division
Office: 630.252.4742 Mobile: 630.803.8183
----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel