Bugs item #981469, was opened at 2004-06-28 15:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by naughtont
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=981469&group_id=9368

Category: Installation
Group: 3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
>Assigned to: Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Summary: step3 fails from DepMan/update-rpms 

Initial Comment:
The DepMan/update-rpm fails in "Step 3: Install OSCAR
Server Packages" at DepMan.pm:304.  This seems to be
from an update-rpms error (but none of that output is
printed).

Here's some debug print stmts w/ the cmdln options for
update-rpms.

--> Installing server non-core RPMs (core RPMs already
installed)
TJNDBG-command_helper:
  aggregatable=(1) command=(update-rpms) cl=(--check
--quiet --cachedir=/var/cache/update-rpms #args 2>&1)
success=()
DepMan: update-rpms failed:  at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/OSCAR/DepMan.pm line 30
7.
--> Step 3: Failed to properly install OSCAR server;
please check the logs


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2004-06-28 17:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

Assigning to you since this appears to actually be a LAM bug.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Thomas Naughton (naughtont)
Date: 2004-06-28 17:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=288102

After doing a bit more testing it appears that the return
code from update-rpms was non-zero in some cases.  I walked
over all PKGS individually and noticed the following pkg
rpms had non-zero rc's from update-rpms, all part of the LAM
package.  
    lam-oscar-module
    lam-gm-oscar
    lam-gm-oscar-module
    lam-switcher-modulefile

Looks like LAM's got some info in 'config.xml' that doesn't
match all filenames of lam/distro/*/*.rpm. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] packages]$ egrep -e lam-gm -e module lam/config.xml 
    <rpm>lam-oscar-module</rpm>
    <rpm>lam-gm-oscar</rpm>
    <rpm>lam-gm-oscar-module</rpm>
    <rpm>lam-switcher-modulefile</rpm>

[EMAIL PROTECTED] packages]$ find lam/distro/|egrep -e lam-gm -e module
lam/distro/mdk90/lam-oscar-module-7.0-2.i586.rpm
lam/distro/mdk90/lam-with-gm-oscar-module-7.0-2.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-gm-oscar-7.0.6-1.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-gm-oscar-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-oscar-modulefile-7.0.6-1.i586.rpm
lam/distro/rh80/lam-switcher-modulefile-7.0.6-1.noarch.rpm

So, i'm pretty sure if I exclude LAM thing will be ok for
Server portion of things, ie. there's no bug in
DepMan/update-rrpms...except that I had no idea what caused
the problem and had to edit the code to figure out what
caused the failure.  ;)

Party on!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=109368&aid=981469&group_id=9368


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to