To argue for a separate README.RHEL3.txt file, I would note that there's a lot 
of stuff for RHEL3 (most of which is for either IA32 or IA64), with no reason 
to clog up the normal release notes.  A note in the release notes to also look 
at this README is fair comment. 

The README.RHEL3.txt file still needs a wee bit of wordsmithing; I'll post some 
comments 1st thing tomorrow morning.

-- 
David N. Lombard
 
My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:oscar-devel-
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bernard Li
>Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 6:28 PM
>To: Thomas Naughton; Fernando Laudares Camargos
>Cc: OSCAR-DEVEL
>Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and elilo problems
>
>Okay I have just modified the file.  Basically I renamed it so that it no
>longer has the ia64 in the filename and added the line wrap which Thomas
>suggested.
>
>If nobody objects, I will also modify the release-notes.tex and simply wipe
>out the whole thing regard RHEL 3 and tell the user to read the
>README.RHAS3.txt file found in the source tarball.  In that case we only
>need to update one file.
>
>What do you guys think?
>
>Alternatively, I can copy the contents of README.RHAS3.txt to the release
>notes and simply delete that file from SVN.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bernard
>
>P.S. How goes RHEL 3 testing on i386/Itanium?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Thomas Naughton
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 13:33
>> To: Fernando Laudares Camargos
>> Cc: OSCAR-DEVEL
>> Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and
>> elilo problems
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Sorry to be a bit anal-retentive on this text but on the long
>> lines, it might help to include the "\" (line wrap) character
>> in the examples since some users might type the commands literally.
>>
>> Just a suggestions,
>> --tjn
>>
>> PS  Glad to see others notice these things too, i.e., <= 79
>> column lines!
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> ___________
>>    Thomas Naughton
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>    Research Associate                                   (865) 576-4184
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Bernard, David,
>> >
>> >       I formated the README.RHAS3.IA64 to a maximum of 79 column
>> > lines, renamed and updated it with Bernard's modifications. I kept
>> > ia64 and the
>> > Intel(R) SR870BH2 tags out of the title.
>> >       I don't known about the consistency of this README
>> and the docs,
>> > so I won't commit those changes to the branch and am sending it
>> > attached (as it'is a small txt).
>> >       Cheers,
>> >              Fernando
>> >
>> > Bernard Li a �crit :
>> >> This README is getting more and more generic - perhaps we
>> should take
>> >> out .ia64 and the Intel(R) SR870BH2 tag?
>> >>
>> >> Also, shouldn't this README be kept consistent with the
>> documentation?
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Bernard
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
>> >>> Tuesday, December 14, 2004 9:45
>> >>> To: Bernard Li; OSCAR-DEVEL
>> >>> Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] README.RHAS3.iA64 (final) and elilo
>> >>> problems
>> >>>
>> >>> From: Bernard Li;  Monday, December 13, 2004 3:57 PM
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hey Fernando:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Looks good, I just got 2 questions:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1) mysql-server
>> >>>>  ------------
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You will need to obtain a mysql-server rpm and put it into
>> >>>
>> >>> /tftpboot/rpm
>> >>>
>> >>>> before starting the OSCAR Wizard. The easiest way is to get the
>> >>>> SRPM
>> >>>
>> >>> and
>> >>>
>> >>>> rebuild,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>   rpmbuild --rebuild mysql-3.23.58-1.src.rpm
>> >>>>   cp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ia64/mysql-server-3.23.58-1.ia64.rpm
>> >>>> /tftpboot/rpm
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If you can't get that SRPM, make sure you also save the
>> other RPMS,
>> >>>
>> >>> e.g.,
>> >>>
>> >>>>   rpmbuild --rebuild mysql-3.23.58-2.3.src.rpm
>> >>>>   cp /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/ia64/mysql*-3.23.58-1.ia64.rpm
>> >>>
>> >>> /tftpboot/rpm
>> >>>
>> >>>> - I am not sure what you mean in the second part...  how come the
>> >>>
>> >>> src.rpm
>> >>>
>> >>>> file versions are different?  Are you saying that the top one is
>> >>>> the recommended version and if you can't find that
>> specific version
>> >>>> make
>> >>>
>> >>> sure
>> >>>
>> >>>> that the other support RPM files are included in
>> >>>
>> >>> /tftpboot/rpm as well?
>> >>>
>> >>>> But how come the version #s are different in the second part
>> >>>
>> >>> (3.23.58-2.3
>> >>>
>> >>>> first line vs 3.23.58-1 second line).
>> >>>
>> >>> I wrote that bit.  So, the version provided by RH is
>> 3.23.58-1.  If
>> >>> you go the Internet, you might find, say, 3.23.58-2.3.
>> This is fine
>> >>> if and only if you also build the other mysql rpms.  That is, you
>> >>> can't mix the mysql-3.23.58-1.arch.rpm w/
>> mysql-server-3.23.58-2.3.arch.rpm.
>> >>>
>> >>> So, should the second sentence say:
>> >>>
>> >>>  If you can't get the 3.23.58-1 source rpm, you must save
>> all the
>> >>> RPMs when you build the mysql-server, that is, all mysql
>> versions
>> >>> must be consistent.  For example, you could do
>> >>>
>> >>> Is this better?  If not, can you suggest some changes?
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> David N. Lombard
>> >>>
>> >>> My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read
>> honest & candid
>> >> reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>> >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start
>> reading now.
>> >> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Oscar-devel mailing list
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
>> >
>> > --
>> > Fernando Laudares Camargos
>> >
>> >      R�volution Linux      http://www.revolutionlinux.com
>> > ---------------------------------------
>> > * Tout opinion et prise de position exprim�e dans ce
>> message est celle
>> > de son auteur et pas n�cessairement celle de R�volution Linux.
>> > ** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are
>> solely those of
>> > the author and do not necessarily represent those of
>> R�volution Linux.
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
>Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
>Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
>http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Oscar-devel mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to