Dave / others,
Did we come to some sort of consensus on the naming scheme for distro/
directories? e.g., <opkg-dir>/distro/{rh9,mdk10,rh3as,fc2}
I see some similarities but wasn't sure if we decided upon something in the
recent cleanup/audits? The biggest odd-ball seems to be Fedora. Some use
"fedora", some use "fedora1", and "fedora2". However all other distros are
2-3 char abbreviations, and "fedora" is just too general if we have
differences acress Fedora releases.
Anyway, please let me know (today) what folks think and I'll use that for
the new APItest dirs I'm creating. Otherwise I'm going to use the
following:
apitest/distro/{rh9, mdk10, rh3as, fc2}
Thanks,
--tjn
_________________________________________________________________________
Thomas Naughton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research Associate (865) 576-4184
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Lombard, David N wrote:
I've attached a binary rpm audit of the trunk.
Various conventions are used to partition distro-specific packages.
Should we make this consistent?
Package-specific comments:
c3
-python2 for i386?
hdf5
-Huh?
-mdk90
lam
-ia64 in rh90?
-gm only for rh90/i386?
maui
-extra maui-oscar-debuginfo
mpich
-ia64 in rh80?
-mdk90?
openpbs
-missing ia64. Do we care?
perl-qt
-no distro-specific dirs?
-libsmokeqt1?
pvm
-mkd90?
-mdk92?
sis
-inconsistent versions
switcher
-env-switcher only in fedora2?
-mkd90?
-mdk92?
--
David N. Lombard
My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
