Do we want to come to a concensus now such that all new packages conform to this standard? We can fix up the old stuff post 4.1.
Cheers, Bernard > -----Original Message----- > From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:55 > To: Bernard Li; Thomas Naughton > Cc: OSCAR-devel > Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] RPM audit > > I looked in to doing that for the very same reason, but it's > a pervasive change, i.e., not for 4.1 > > -- > David N. Lombard > > My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:09 PM > >To: Thomas Naughton > >Cc: Lombard, David N; OSCAR-devel > >Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] RPM audit > > > >> apitest/distro/rh9/mdk10.0/rh3as/fc2 > > ^^^^^ > > This seems confusing too... we do support the entire > rhel3 line, so > >maybe it should be rhel3 instead. > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
