On Jun 24, 2005, at 10:57 AM, Geoffroy Vallée wrote:
Even if the main idea of a SSI to give a blackbox (the user does not
know
where/when is executed the application), Kerrighed allow to implement
any
scheduling policy. Unfortunately, such a policy (to reserve
resources, ...etc.) is not implemented right now (that's a reason why
I am
using Torque with SSI-OSCAR).
But anyway, a SSI provides some mechanisms for resource management so
do we
need to include it in the RM_Detect framework? or do you think it is a
specific case and using a batch system right now, only batch systems
are
important for the framework?
No, I would think that we're talking about resource management here.
In some cases, batch schedulers [effectively] function as both.
So I think having an kerrighed component in the RM_Detect framework
would be a reasonable thing.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
