Hi,
just to relate some divergences regarding dependences problem between yum and urpm (Mandriva):
while running Step 3, I got the following output (verbose mode):
-----------------------------------------
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.0.1-5mdk for package: gcc-gfortran
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.0.1-5mdk is needed by package
gcc-gfortran
--> Successfully installed server non-core RPMs
--> Marking installed bit in ODA for server non-core RPMS
--> Done marking installed bits in ODA
-------------------------------------------
This shows two problems: the major one is that the installation of the server non-core
packages is being considered "successfull". The other problem is that
gcc-gfortran is not being installed due to a missing dependency (libgfortran).
If I try urpmi:
----------------------------------------------
# urpmi gcc-gfortran
To satisfy dependencies, the following 2 packages are going to be installed (6
MB):
gcc-gfortran-4.0.1-5mdk.i586
libgfortran0-4.0.1-5mdk.i586
Is this OK? (Y/n) y
installing gcc-gfortran-4.0.1-5mdk.i586.rpm libgfortran0-4.0.1-5mdk.i586.rpm
from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms
Preparing... #############################################
1/2: libgfortran0 #############################################
2/2: gcc-gfortran #############################################
----------------------------------------------
urpmi finds the dependency. But if I check what rpm has to say:
----------------------------------------------
# rpm -qp --provides libgfortran0-4.0.1-5mdk.i586.rpm
libgfortran = 4.0.1
libgfortran4.0 = 4.0.1-5mdk
libgfortran.so.0
libgfortran0 = 4.0.1-5mdk
----------------------------------------------
You can see that I don't explicitly have *libgfortran = 4.0.1-5mdk* (although I
have libgfortran = 4.0.1 and libgfortran0 = 4.0.1-5mdk).
I don't know how urpm do to "match" the dependency, once the "exact" dependency is not
"covered" by the package.
As this have happened with only one package (until now) I wonder with one can
rebuild the package and fix the mis-match.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Laudares Camargos
Révolution Linux
http://www.revolutionlinux.com
---------------------------------------
* Tout opinion et prise de position exprimée dans ce message est celle de son
auteur et pas nécessairement celle de Révolution Linux.
** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily represent those of Révolution Linux.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
