Title: Re: [Oscar-devel] dependences Yum/URPM
Can we add a check such that if yum fails to install some dependencies then the installation will bail?
 
Cheers,
 
Bernard


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Erich Focht
Sent: Tue 21/02/2006 14:08
To: [email protected]
Cc: Fernando Laudares Camargos; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] dependences Yum/URPM

Hi Fernando,

which version of yum was this? Did you rebuild and try a new one? There's also
a 2.5.1 version around... The createrepo executable is updated in trunk.

Thanks,
Erich


On Tuesday 21 February 2006 21:41, Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
> Hi,
> just to relate some divergences regarding dependences problem between yum and urpm (Mandriva):
> while running Step 3, I got the following output (verbose mode):
> -----------------------------------------
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Processing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.0.1-5mdk for package: gcc-gfortran
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: libgfortran = 4.0.1-5mdk is needed by package gcc-gfortran
> --> Successfully installed server non-core RPMs
> --> Marking installed bit in ODA for server non-core RPMS
> --> Done marking installed bits in ODA
> -------------------------------------------
> This shows two problems: the major one is that the installation of the server non-core packages is being considered "successfull". The other problem is that gcc-gfortran is not being installed due to a missing dependency (libgfortran).



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to