Title: Re: [Oscar-devel] pfilter issue
I went back and tested 1.707 (the version in trunk) and it works perfectly fine with Fedora Core 5.  Go figures.
 
Cheers,
 
Bernard


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bernard Li
Sent: Sat 08/07/2006 22:47
To: Fernando Laudares Camargos
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] pfilter issue

Hi Fernando:
 
Okay I have confirmed this under Fedora Core 4 x86 and it is indeed an issue with pfilter.  The thing is, the last update was not just a minor patch, we updated the package from 1.705 -> 1.707.
 
However, I'm quite surprised that this issue was not discovered sooner.
 
Anyways, I did try 1.705 and it worked fine, so one solution would be to downgrade the version to 1.705 but include the patch I did for Fedora Core 5.
 
I'll email Neil to see if this is something he can look into.
 
Thanks for reporting the issue - can you please file a bug in Trac?
 
P.S. You mentioned that you rebuilt pfilter without the patch and it worked...  was that 1.705 or 1.707 - if it's 1.707 can you please make the RPM available to download so that I can test it?  Because I rebuilt 1.707 without my patch and it's still broken.
 
Cheers,
 
Bernard


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bernard Li
Sent: Fri 07/07/2006 11:52
To: Fernando Laudares Camargos
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] pfilter issue

Hi Fernando:

Here are the details of the patch:

http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/trac/oscar/ticket/12

Can you check the new syntax of sort on Mandriva and see if it works?

However, I don't see how this syntax change should cause such a huge problem...

Cheers,

Bernard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fernando Laudares Camargos
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 11:37
> To: Bernard Li
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] Updated RPMs for TORQUE, SGE, pfilter
>
> John, Bernard,
>
> I know it will sound strange, since I should have looked at
> this in the first time, but I tried to rebuild the package
> without the new Patch default.rulesset and it worked - so the
> problem is still with the output of ifconfig, but it depends
> when it will be executing.
>
> I can't look further at it right now, I just wanted to let you know.
> I will send you more news once I study the case.
>
> Cheers,
> Fernando
>
> Bernard Li a écrit :
> > Hi Fernando:
> >
> > Yes on Red Hat it's also 10:
> >
> > # chkconfig: 2345 10 90
> >
> > I'm cc:ing Neil Gorsuch to see if he has any opinions
> regarding this.
> >
> > I'm assuming pfilter is at 11 because it wants to be
> started immediately after network is brought up since after
> all, it is a firewall...
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Bernard
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 13:34
> >>To: Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >>Cc: Bernard Li; [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] Updated RPMs for TORQUE, SGE, pfilter
> >>
> >>Actually,
> >>
> >>what I was trying to say is this: looking at pfilter in
> >>/etc/init.d/pfilter I see the following line for chkconfig:
> >># chkconfig: - 11 92
> >>while /etc/init.d/network has the following line
> >># chkconfig: 2345 10 90
> >>
> >>As you can see, network start as the 10th service and pfilter
> >>as the 11th. If I pass pfilter, for example, to 15th or
> >>above, it works (what causes the delay in the stablishment of
> >>the network is dhclient, that needs some time to get the
> >>reply from the dhcp server).
> >>
> >>What do you guys think about that? Does 'network' has also
> >>'10' the second chkconfig parameter in Fedora/RedHat?
> >>
> >>Thanks again,
> >>Fernando
> >>
> >>Fernando Laudares Camargos a écrit :
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I haven't had this problem before 2006. This could simply
> >>
> >>be solved by forcing the service to start before network
> >>(like putting it in the end of the queue).
> >>
> >>>I dont't believe there's a hardware issue that could be
> >>
> >>causing this.
> >>
> >>>I will contact the Mandriva developers.
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Fernando
> >>>
> >>>Bernard Li a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Hi Fernando:
> >>>>
> >>>>I do not routinely test pfilter, but usually it works as
> >>
> >>long as I update my kernel (on the headnode) to the latest version.
> >>
> >>>>Anyways, this is a new issue with Mandriva 2006?  Did you
> >>
> >>encounter this with 10.0/10.1?
> >>
> >>>>Perhaps others who test with pfilter can pitch in, but I do
> >>
> >>not believe this is an issue on the other distroes.
> >>
> >>>>Is this something you can bring attention to the Mandriva
> >>
> >>developers?  Also, I wonder if there are any hardware issues
> >>which is causing the delay to bring up the network interface?
> >> Have you tried on different hardware and they all have the
> >>same issue?
> >>
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>>Bernard
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>>>From: Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >>>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>>>>Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 8:06
> >>>>>To: Bernard Li
> >>>>>Cc: [email protected]
> >>>>>Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] Updated RPMs for TORQUE, SGE, pfilter
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I finally realised what was the problem with Pfilter and
> >>>>>Mandriva 2006.
> >>>>>The service 'pfilter' starts right after the service 'network
> >>>>>in this distribution', but the network is not 'entirely' up
> >>>>>at this point. So when the function 'find_interfaces', which
> >>>>>uses the output from /sbin/ifconfig, is called it cannot
> >>>>>recover any network information and throws the following warning:
> >>>>>-----------------------------------
> >>>>>/usr/sbin/pfilter: cannot find any interface names with
> >>>>>/sbin/ifconfig command
> >>>>>----------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>>That explains why re-starting pfilter once the node is up
> >>>>>solve the problem - then the network is already stablished.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I didn't find an elegant way to fix this problem. What I
> >>>>>tried with success was use a 'sleep' time of 1-2 seconds in
> >>>>>the pfilter code source before the 'find_interfaces' command
> >>>>>is called, which give enough time for the network to be up.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Do you know if the order of initialization of network and
> >>>>>pfilter is the same in other distros?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Can you suggest any other way to deal with this problem?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Thanks,
> >>>>>Fernando
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Bernard Li a écrit :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I have rebuilt RPMs for TORQUE and SGE in trunk, so you
> >>>>>
> >>>>>will need to
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>rebuild them on your OS/arch (unless you're on fc5-x86
> >>>>>
> >>>>>;-)).  Please let
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>me know if you encounter any issues.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>pfilter has also been updated, but since it is noarch, I am not
> >>>>>>expecting any issues.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>And the other package I'm working on is almost done too, so
> >>>>>
> >>>>>stay tuned
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>for that.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Cheers,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Bernard
> >>>>>
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    Révolution Linux           
> >>>>>http://www.revolutionlinux.com  
> >>>>>---------------------------------------
> >>>>>* Tout opinion et prise de position exprimée dans ce message
> >>>>>est celle de son auteur et pas nécessairement celle de
> >>>>>Révolution Linux.
> >>>>>** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are solely
> >>>>>those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> >>>>>Révolution Linux.
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>Fernando Laudares Camargos
> >>
> >>      Révolution Linux            
> >>http://www.revolutionlinux.com     
> >>---------------------------------------
> >>* Tout opinion et prise de position exprimée dans ce message
> >>est celle de son auteur et pas nécessairement celle de
> >>Révolution Linux.
> >>** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are solely
> >>those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> >>Révolution Linux.
> >>
>
> --
> Fernando Laudares Camargos
>
>       Révolution Linux              
> http://www.revolutionlinux.com       
> ---------------------------------------
> * Tout opinion et prise de position exprimée dans ce message
> est celle de son auteur et pas nécessairement celle de
> Révolution Linux.
> ** Any views and opinion presented in this e-mail are solely
> those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
> Révolution Linux.
>

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to