I am very confused because you speak about check-ins that concern only systeminstaller and not systemconfigurator.
r6046 was done only in order to temporarily fix a problem we had before to have OPKGC. Now this modification can be reverted, i fully agree with your analysis on this point. r6047 only concerns Debian packages, if you revert it, most certainly we will not be able to build Debian packages for systeminstaller anymore. I do not understand why you want to revert it (no real justification if i understand correctly what you mean). Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 12:40, Erich Focht a écrit : > Hello, > > I plan to revert following two changes: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r6047 | ngraham | 2007-07-21 01:17:05 +0200 (Sa, 21 Jul 2007) | 4 lines > > Fixes problems with Debian packages: > - configuration files are now correctly included in the packages. > - files for SIS db are now in the systemconfigurator-oscar package. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r6046 | ngraham | 2007-07-21 01:15:58 +0200 (Sa, 21 Jul 2007) | 3 lines > > Because of OPKGC we cannot have any more a direct dependency with > systemconfigurator. We have now a direct dependency with opkg-sis-client. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > (maybe with expection to the first part of r6047). > > The files for SIS db need to be created by systeminstaller. They belong to > the systeminstaller and should not be created by systemconfigurator. The > purpose of systemconfigurator is completely different. > > The second problem: r6046 introduces (without need) a requirement for an > OSCAR metapackage! This is not good and should not be done. Systeminstaller > can (could) be installed also stand-alone. There is absolutely no problem > if systeminstaller-oscar requires systemconfigurator (the package, not the > opkg). If systemconfigurator was installed as dependency, opkg-sis will > have less packages to install. But opkg-sis-client should still require > systemconfigurator, of course. > > Maybe this was actually a non issue and a problem which resulted from the > wrong conversion of the dependencies (by opkg-convert). Those are fixed > now. > > Regards, > Erich > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Oscar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel -- Geoffroy ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
