On Wednesday 31 October 2007 01:54, Geoffroy VALLEE wrote: > On Tuesday 30 October 2007, Erich Focht wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 October 2007 19:22, Geoffroy Vallee wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 17:12 +0100, Erich Focht wrote: > > That works, but doesn't solve some things doable by prereqs easilly: > > removing some rpms and executing some (arbitrary) scripts. It can be done > > over the long term, but not in the next week. > > Yes but on this other side you are deeply modifying the OSCAR architecture > which mid-term will be pretty bad for other projects. Binary packages can > also give you conflicts and dependencies. Based on that i think it should be > pretty simple to implement what i propose.
You proposed to stay with the current setup and I agreed. What is your problem? Can't you see that we're in wild agreement here? > Sorry but it works pretty well on Debian (i do not say it is perfect). RPM > developers have been inactive, this is another problem. Do not generalize > your situation. > And why you do not like this idea. Without a clear explanation, sorry your > point of view cannot be accepted. > BTW, i has ready to explain my latest developments and try to federate > efforts. Do you try to communicate with me? If do not think so... Read the other emails. I don't need this kind of crap. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
