On Feb 11, 2008 5:18 AM, DongInn Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Well, my fedora-8-i386.url is
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat fedora-8-i386.url
> > file:/tftpboot/distro/fedora-8-i386
> > http://ftp.ussg.iu.edu/linux/fedora/linux/releases/8/Everything/i386/os
>
> As you can see, mine is not the dvd one but everything containing all the
> rpms (DVD + updates + etc).
> Yes, I confirm that the DVD repo and DVD does not have all the rpms that
> we need and we should use the "Everything" repository.
>
This took me a long time to figure out. It was not clear that a) I needed to
do this at all and b) that /installing/ the missing packages was not good
enough *and* if you did that, the image would be created but would never
work. The documentation needs some Fedora 8-specific additions. Which I will
try to suggest/add when I get this cluster operational.
For some reason I still can't discern, OSCAR is incapable of using yum to
pull RPM's right off the server like I can do through "yum install" @ the
command prompt. Plus OSCAR won't cache the ~250mb of RPM's it pulls off the
remote repositories, and refuses to acknowledge them when I directly
incorporate them into a local yum repository *and* reference it in the
advanced repository. This stuff needs mentioning.
>
> I have never tested OSCAR 5.1 b1 or branch-5-1 on VMware and mine is just
> a normal P4 machine.
As are my expected server and client nodes. VMware is my way of saying I'm
sick and tired of messing with the PCs until I get this sorted out. OSCAR
behaves, in my estimation, counter-intuitively sometimes.
>
> The VMWare behavior may cause some problems that we have not expected but
> I have never encountered eric's problems on my physical machines.
Agreed. I think my current imaging problems I'm seeing on VMware are VMware
specific due to the way VMware does harddrives. If I had an extra drive I
could directly access with the image, I'm sure I'd be OK. But I don't. I'm
going to be either imaging directly off a VMware headnode or a server with
OSCAR installed the way I have it installed on VMware later today.
Yes, I know that FC5 is the real "supported" version but I do not trust it
to work reliably on all my machines since I have a mix of IDE and SCSI
drives. I don't seem to have that many other options as far as either
clustering solutions [ROCKS is too demanding] or other OS' are concerned
[Redhat == Fedora, everything else = x86_64 or ppc].
>
> So eric, can you please try to play with OSCAR 5.1 b1 on an actual machine
> when you have a chance?
> Please post again if you still have the same problems.
I did, but the responses were less than helpful.
My current theory is that /Everything isn't good enough, that I need to have
the /updates directory as well. Which is what I used as I built the images
on VMware. I'm going to use VMware to act as the server node until I'm
satisfied I have the kinks worked out. This only because I'm sick of
reinstalling Fedora and OSCAR to ensure none of my fuckups are transitioning
between attempts.
It must be the case that I'm missing something simple since so many people
seem to be making FC8 work on newer hardware & OSCAR 5.1b1. The stuff I'm
using is ~6 years old, but still perfectly functional. P4's and P3's, with 1
possibly 2 Athlon's thrown in.
I spent most of my time trying to figure out why installing packages
directly wasn't good enough. The last week has had me fiddling with online
repositories and figuring out PXE & dhcp since I have used neither before.
My last attempt on the P4 head node was as it is now, except I wasn't using
the updates directory to help build the image. The image built correctly,
PXE & dhcp played ball, and the image downloaded. Except the image would not
install on the harddrive for some reason. Yes, I know a log would be helpful
but I can't copy and paste out of the terminal window for some goddamn
reason and I can't remember what the error was. I'm sure I'll see it again.
The only other theory I have is that the dells I have are pieces of shit and
that FC8, even though it installs w/o incident on them, somehow chokes
anyway. I'll try throwing it on an old non-dell P3 or AMD Athlon system to
check that out.
[...]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel