--+JUInw4efm7IfTNU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 03:06:18PM -0600, Jeremy Enos wrote:
> Holger-
> Thanks for the details on your experience... these accounts prove very=20
> valuable for other users. You raise an interesting question about using=
=20
> pfilter on private networks though. Basically, we use it on private=20
> networks because there hasn't ever been a recorded or reported performanc=
e=20
> impact by it, and there are other reasons to default to secure mode, even=
=20
> on a private subnet. =20
I'm surprised by that statement. Do you have numbers for that? I would
expect that with a network intensive program going through the iptables
layer and checking every packet would add a serious ammount of extra
overhead.
-Sean
--=20
_______________________________________________________________________
=09
Sean Dague [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dague.net
There is no silver bullet. Plus, werewolves make better neighbors than
zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down.
_______________________________________________________________________
--+JUInw4efm7IfTNU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE+PwNFSamXem9TdyYRAvJNAJ9tfshvRkRL5d6eD/BVlTh6tEvzHACfZGK8
yyeW/pajR2xls+OwU3szDro=
=QR3x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+JUInw4efm7IfTNU--
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
