On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Frank Crawford wrote:
> > Hmm. I thought we *did* remove the native LAM RPM if it was previously
> > installed -- or at least I know that we did at one point. Are you saying
> > that the RH-installed LAM was still installed after the OSCAR installation
> > completed?
>
> Yes, or at least it was in my case. I had a full install of RH 9, and
> after installing OSCAR 2.3 (not 2.3.1) it was still there.
Actually, I think I know what happened. The OSCAR LAM RPM used to be
named lam-<version>-<release>oscar.i586.rpm. Hence, it had the same base
name as the "lam" RPM that was installed by RedHat, and when the OSCAR
version was installed, it was via "rpm -Uvh", so the RH LAM was simply
"upgraded" to the OSCAR RPM.
I'll file a bug to fix this. Thanks for noticing.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
