Well I certainly find that it feels better than the old __proto__ deal.
But I'm not so sure about making the entry point a movie clip. In my
movies I always create a controller and THEN from the controller create
the first view. The controller handles initiating remoting, FlashVars,
XML and whatnot. Usually what I do is place:
ctrl = new Controller(this);
on the main timeline and it's the only bit of code in my Flash movie. I
then store a reference to the root in the controller. I'd like to see
this kind of workflow more integrated in FAMES.
Patrick Mineault
www.5etdemi.com
www.5etdemi.com
www.amfphp.org
Aral Balkan wrote:
Hey guys, if you haven't already, check out my article on this and let
me know what you think:
http://flashant.org/index.php?p=408&more=1&c=1
Aral
Rostislav Hristov wrote:
Hi Ralf,
swfmill is getting better in graphics/font importing and it's
definately the way to embed external files in a resulting SWF. I have
doubts about a single flash file vs. multiple files, because the first
one is suitable but the second option leaves the door open for PNG/JPG
formats. I'm currently using swfmill -> mtasc workflow and I wonder
are there any benefits of the opposite way: mtasc -> swfmill.
Cheers,
Rostislav
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
