Claus’s SEFFS solution and Peter’s Ripple framework are something inverted to each other. Because Claus proposes first to create the XHTML version of site and then to render it to Flash state using SEFFS. Peter’s goes from opposite side, proposing first to create flash and then it’s “XHTML-mirror” then, right?

Rost

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hansen
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 11:48 AM
To: Peter Hall; Open Source Flash Mailing List
Subject: Re: [osflash] Introducing Ripple

 

Hi,

Ripple is a Claus Wahlers' use of sIFR to do a
similar thing.
Google did index his test site, but who knows if the ranking wadelicious idea, but what is the probability that the search engines, e.g. google, will penalized my site for using this technique (i.e. for cloaking)?

I've looked at s affected?

Any comments on this 'issue' ?


Cheers

   -michael

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to