On Wednesday 20 July 2005 17:45, emilianoz wrote: > On Wednesday 20 July 2005 17:35, David Rorex wrote: > > On 7/20/05, Tim Beynart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What exactly are you trying to do? > > > > On 7/20/05, emilianoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Aiming at distributing .swf files on a fixed medium (a HD) with a > > > desktop Linux, > > > > What I understand: > > emi wants to load some .swfs and flash player on a desktop computer > > running linux, and then distribute it. He asked macromedia on what the > > terms were for distributing flash player on linux, and then macromedia > > said: > > * You can distribute flash player with supported versions of linux > > * Fedora is not supported (and then they say fedora is a linux kernel, > > which is completly wrong), therefore you cannot distribute flash > > player on it (they could just say 'it's not supported' but no: they > > said he is legally forbidden from doing it) > > * You cannot distribute on 'embedded' versions of linux > > * GNU/Linux (a generic term applying to ALL distributions of linux) is > > considered an embedded version of linux (also completely wrong) > > > > Understandably, emi seems very confused. > > > > -David R > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > Yes David, you have got the pionts. > > emi > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
the POINTs I mean. BTW, I was not forbidden to DISTRIBUTE the player but (even!) to INSTALL it. Emi _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
