> Nicolas, was it a choice of yours to have this difference between > MTasc and MMC or did it not appear intellectualy satisfying when you > thought the grammar for MTasc ? I'd greatly appreciate your point of > view on the question.
Yes it was a choice. MTASC parser is less strict than MMC one, but otoh the syntax is enforced by only allowing expressions with "side effects". It is true that in functional languages "1" is an expression, but in that case you might get a compilation warning saying you're discarding a value (at least in OCaml). Nicolas _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
