My CSS proposal was to extend the layout using a fixed 980 pixels so it display nicely on 1024 resolution even with left scrollbar and still we can see a little the L/R gradients. I think it could be nice to have a fixed width since it will display the same whatever the client resolution.
In the CSS there was also some other changes like smaller caps for the left menu, remove the boxes of internal links and no extra letter spacing for menu and content titles since it degrades readability. Maybe Aral can send it to you and we can have a look at what would be better ? I really the like new design but imho there is a little loss in readability compared to previous one. Nicolas > Hello > > I think, using a liquid layout could be better :) > > like 90% of 1024, or 800, or 1400, etc ... > we could have more screen width for content. > I do, after i send you, and, you watch :) > > Regards, > > 2005/10/15, Aral Balkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi NikO, > > > > Nicolas (the other one) sent me a CSS update that widens the site to > > support 1024x768 resolution as a minimum. I'm integrating that into the > > site (just fiddling with leading, etc. for better readability). > > > > What do you mean by 90% weight? :) > > > > Take care, > > Aral > > > > [ NikO ] wrote: > > > > >I work in a update of the design, with 90% weight, to have more for > > >content into big resolution. > > > > > >I tell you when i finish ... > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > > > -- > http://niko.informatif.org > http://wiki.media-box.net > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
