Ok Ralf, I think that Nicolas idea is very good, and very very respetable. But maybe this could be a solution targeted for people how loves this kind of technologies, and want to play with them, and maybe some day (in a not near future), we could start fighting in our business, or in our clients to push Neko. ( for this we need frameworks, tools, servers, etc...)
But the reality nowadays is that Flex 2 brings all the facilities( If they get a fast compiler ala MTASC - this is critical and I must to see it to belive it). The Flex Framework, The Flex Builder 2, AS3, FP8.5...it's all what we were looking for an affordable price. And it will be here in a few months. I think that this year was the MTASC year, but the following will be the Flex year. 2005/10/24, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > No, i don't think i'm able to do that. What i did with hamtasc is just > hacking against a working codebase. Building such a thing from ground > up, is an entire different story. Also, if i really wanted to implement > some language, it would be Lisp. ;) > > I'm really looking forward to Nicolas' approach. Nicolas new system of > translating to Neko frees the community from slavishly following the > development of ActionScript. It enables us to test our own languages or > even to implement AS3 on it, if you really need it. That's real choice, > the promise of open source, as far as i understand. > > Cheers, > Ralf, > > > Carlos Rovira wrote: > > > Ralf, > > > > I don't want to say that you *MUST* to get the torch :) > > > > > > > > 2005/10/24, Carlos Rovira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >>Ralf, > >> > >>I'm not following the entire disscusion in this thread, but I must to > >>point that If MTASC don't go the AS3 way...I'm afraid that almost the > >>rest of OS Flash Proyects are certainly dead. > >> > >>ASDT > Enterprises will choose to pay the Flex Builder 2 license. > >>ActionStep - ASWing > Will be a toys compared with Flex 2 Framework based > >>on AS3 > >>etc.... > >> > >>I'll remember the "AS1 to AS2" change, and too much people say that > >>they didn't want to move to AS2. Sure that a lot of those people now > >>is coding in AS2. > >> > >>Now the change is even more necesary, and we can't rely in MTASC if > >>there's no AS3 update plans. > >> > >>I think that you are the only public man with your skills and HAMTASC > >>capable of create an MTASC-AS3. > >> > >> > >> > >>2005/10/24, Ralf Bokelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >>>To base dicussions like "The future of MTASC" on facts instead of > >>>uncertainty, it would be nice to know, how many people are actually > >>>using it. A lot of other questions come into my mind too. For example, > >>>how many people are still using AS1? As far as i can see from the posts > >>>at the german flashforum, this rate still is about 97 percent. > >>> > >>>I wonder, if the osflash wiki gives us the possibility to built such a > >>>poll? > >>> > >>>Cheers, > >>>Ralf. > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>osflash mailing list > >>>[email protected] > >>>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > >>> > >> > >> > >>-- > >>::| Carlos Rovira > >>::| http://www.carlosrovira.com > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ::| Carlos Rovira > > ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > osflash mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > -- ::| Carlos Rovira ::| http://www.carlosrovira.com _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
