Edwin van Rijkom wrote: > I hope you are right but I think the problem might be more fundamental. > Screenweaver for example, is written in C++, a 'common' language. Still, > there is very few people working on the code base. It seems that there's > a tendency that projects stay 'exclusively owned' by their initiators > even though they're open source, regardless of what language they're > written in? Perhaps the 'domain knowledge' treshold is just too high.
This is true to some extent, but I suspect that if the ScreenWeaver maintainer(s) were to lose interest and move on, there would be more people willing to pick up the baton. Again, this is all supposition. _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
